Description: This module formalises the process of scientific peer review as a component of research-based learning. Building on the
Research Proposal and Master Project modules, students engage in structured evaluation of their peers’ Master Project drafts.
The activity emulates the professional peer review process central to scientic communication, fostering critical reflection, academic integrity, and collaborative learning.
The module follows an iterative review structure, allowing multiple rounds of feedback and revision. Students assess their peers’ work according to scientific criteria including conceptual soundness, methodological rigour, and clarity of communication. The process culminates in discussions and presentations during the annual program workshop. The Peer Review module overlaps with the final phase of the Master Project to enable timely incorporation of feedback into the final submission. The activities of this module are harmonised with the program’s Journal of Ecological Forecasting
Learning outcomes:
Critically evaluate scientific research products using established peer review criteria.
Provide structured, constructive feedback to improve the quality and clarity of scientific work.
Reflect on the ethical, collaborative, and communicative aspects of the peer review process.
Integrate peer and mentor feedback into the revision and refinement of scientific products.
Contribute effectively to the dissemination of forecasting research through open and transparent scholarly practices.
Module group: Research Module
Credits: 5 ECTS
Lecturers: Prof. Dr. Steven Higgins